Contracting Overseas: deciding how to structure your contract
In his second
article for the site, David Houston of Global K Limited takes us
through some of the options you may be faced with when you decide to take a
contract overseas... This is an updated version of the article for 2002.
Introduction
Historically when you first entered the world of contracting in the UK, one
of the first pieces of advice, or instructions, that you would receive would
be – “you must form a limited company”. The reason for this is that,
pre-IR35, if you contracted through any format other than a limited company,
you could have been deemed to be an employee of the agency or even of the
end-client company. The legislation that created this possibility was
contained in a 1988 piece of UK tax legislation.
Alternatively, if you were contracting short-term or if you couldn't be
bothered with the hassle of your own limited company, you may have been
given the option of joining a “composite” or “umbrella” company.
However, if you decide to undertake a contract overseas, you may find that
as you phone around for tax or administrative advice, you are being pointed
in a number of different directions, each one of which is claimed by its
proponent to be “simply the best”.
In this short article I will look at some of the options offered to you and
some of the attractions / pitfalls of each one. I will also try to describe
that often the best route for you to follow will vary from country to
country, or even within the one country, depending on your own
circumstances.
The options you may be offered
The various options that may be offered to you are as follows: -
i) continue to use your own UK limited company
ii) set-up your own limited company in the foreign country
iii) register as self-employed in the foreign country
iv) become an employee of a foreign registered management company
v) become an employee of an “offshore” foreign management company
vi) become an employee of a UK registered management company
I shall now look at each one in turn.
Continuing to use your own UK limited company
This option is often the favourite of the UK contractor as it is the
solution he has been using for a number of years and he is comfortable with
the mechanics of running his own company.
Furthermore, many recruitment agencies in their naivety will often be happy
for you to continue operating in this manner, probably on the basis of “if
it ain't broke – don't fix it!”.
However there are many reasons why it is not wise to continue to use your
own UK company when you are overseas. Let us look at some of them: -
a) Corporate tax residence
A company is generally deemed to be tax resident in the location where it's
physical control and management is exercised. Since the control and
management of the UK one-man company is generally retained by the
controlling director, (i.e. the contractor himself), then it naturally
follows that should the director be physically located in, say, Brussels,
then the Belgian authorities would have a pretty good case if they decided
to assess the UK company as though it were a Belgian company.
The implications of this for the contractor can be quite severe. For one
thing, the contractor as an employee of the (so-called) Belgian tax resident
entity would automatically be liable to Belgian taxes and social security at
source on any payments made to him by the company. Also, any profits made by
the company (including those paid as dividends to the contractor) would be
liable to Belgian corporate taxes.
Needless to say, Belgian income and corporate taxes and social security are
significantly higher than their UK equivalents. And since the contractor
would almost certainly not have pre-declared his status to the Belgian
authorities penalties and interest would probably be added to any
assessment. Therefore this approach could prove very costly to the
contractor.
b) Labour-hiring or labour-leasing
Most European countries have legislation which restricts or forbids the
right of employers to “lease” its employees, “hire-out” its employees, or
place its employees at the disposal of third-parties, without having
pre-obtained a license to do so. In some countries (France unless you are
French; Belgium due to bureaucratic burdens) it is impossible to obtain such
a license. In others (Germany – up to £10,000 in legal and other fees) the
cost is prohibitive.
Now it is reasonably clear that the contractor working through his own UK
company would be contravening the labour-hiring laws, as his company would
be putting him at the disposal of another employer (the agency, or the
client).
Therefore this condition alone ought to be enough to dissuade the average
contractor from deciding to operate through his own company.
c) IR35
Strange as it may seem the simple decision to move overseas does not
automatically exempt the contractor from the burdens imposed by IR35, where
the contractor continues to work through his own UK company. IR 35 applies
to UK personal service companies, and does not distinguish between those
operations in the UK or operating outside the UK. So, if your goal in going
overseas is to escape IR35, the best plan is to ditch your UK company before
you move overseas!
Setting up your own limited company in the foreign country
Often the contractor may believe that the best approach to structuring his
overseas contract is to replicate the approach he used in the UK, and simply
to set-up his own incorporated company in the foreign country where his
contract will be based.
There are several reasons why this is not a good idea: -
a) It may not be legal
Not every country has historically been as laid back as the UK in allowing
individuals to restructure themselves overnight and repackage their
employment as a service from company to company!
In fact in some countries the concept of the one-man service company does
not exist (e.g. some Scandinavian countries) whereas in others (e.g. Spain,
Italy) the concept is generally “looked through” by the social security
authorities and the contractual arrangement is re-categorised and assessed
as employment.
Believe it or not the logic of outlawing such arrangements has generally
been to protect employees from unscrupulous employers denying them their
rights, rather than a pathetic attempt to redefine the tax burden on an
entrepreneurial sector of the labour force (a la IR35)!
b) The complications of foreign legislation
Do you remember when you first set up your own UK limited company? Do you
remember thinking how complicated it all was?
Well, try and take that experience into a foreign country and try it all
over again. At least in the UK you knew about PAYE, had an idea about
national insurance, had heard of the horrors of the VAT-man, and spoke the
same language as the legislation was written in! Even more than that, you
probably had some chance back then of understanding what you were being told
by your accountant / professional adviser!
So maybe you'd find setting up in a foreign country an even more frightening
prospect!
Registering as self-employed in the foreign country
This is an option which offers some possibilities in certain specific
situations, but also suffers from some of the pitfalls pointed out in the
previous section. Usually if you are advised to register as self-employed in
the foreign country it will be through the medium of a (friendly?)
management company, which will often be UK based. Therefore the
complications of dealing with a foreign accountant may be avoided.
However you have, as always, to watch out for the pitfalls, and the legality
of what you are doing comes to the forefront as usual. Again you may find
that being a contractor and claiming you are self-employed are not mutually
compatible. Most countries have some sort of legislation similar to what we
have seen with IR35, and therefore spending all your time in one place for
the reward of a regular income would be deemed to be “employment” rather
than “self-employment”.
Furthermore, one of the most popular destinations for UK contractors, The
Netherlands, has specific legislation which insists that all foreign
contract staff must be payrolled by a Dutch registered wage-tax company,
therefore self-employment is a strictly “no-go” solution. Other European
countries are rumoured to be thinking of going down the same route as the
Dutch.
Becoming an employee of a foreign registered management company
This is an option which must be considered in certain specific
situations, and it is also one which can offer some benefits in other
situations. However like every other choice placed on your table, it is not
a solution which should be walked into without a bit of thought, and it is
not a solution which should be accepted across the board as you move from
country to country.
The most obvious situation where this is the preferred solution is where
work-permit or visa considerations must be taken into account. For the UK
national, working anywhere in the European Community does not require a work
permit. However if you want to accept that lucrative offer to contract in
Switzerland, then there will usually (although I have heard of exceptions)
be no alternative other than to source a Swiss-based management company who
will sponsor you work permit application. In such a situation you will of
course be subject to Swiss taxes and social security from day one!
By the same token, if you are a non-EC citizen, then you would need to use,
say, a Belgian based management company if you wanted to undertake a
contract in Belgium!
In other situations there will be tax allowances or breaks available to
employees of a local employer which are not available to the employee of the
foreign employer, and these things must be taken into account when weighing
up the optimum solution for the contractor going overseas. However it must
be said that more often than not the one over-riding factor which will
decide against the foreign management company (where there is an option)
will be the burden of foreign social security, especially employer's social
security, which can wipe-out one-third of the contractors income in certain
situations!
Becoming an employee of an “offshore” foreign management company
I won't go on at great length about when one should and should not decide to
operate through an offshore company, as the subject probably deserves an
article to itself!
However, suffice to say that if you are an EC-citizen and you are
contracting in the EC, there is only one situation where setting up though
an offshore company should be considered. In every other situation the
offshore option is likely only to be offered as part of a solution which
involves some form of tax evasion!
However if your contract is outside the EC, especially in the Middle or Far
East, then there are situations where it is definitely beneficial to
consider the offshore option.
Becoming an employee of a UK registered management company
One of the more popular solutions offered by the UK professional adviser is
that the contractor should become an employee of a UK registered management
company during his contract career overseas. Several advantages are
presented in support of this solution: -
a) Remaining in the UK national insurance system.
UK national insurance is amongst the lowest in Europe, with only Ireland and
Denmark of the EC countries having significantly lower social security
exposure than that experienced in the UK. By remaining an employee of a UK
employer, the UK contractor can generally (but not automatically!) obtain
certificate E101, which allows him to voluntarily be subject to UK national
insurance for the first year of his employment overseas. This can often be
extended to a second year by applying for certificate E102. The financial
advantages of remaining in the UK system are significant, when you consider
that employer's social security in the UK is 12.2% of income, whereas in
Europe it often reaches as much as 35% of income!
b) Not subject to foreign taxes at source
In a number of countries (not all) there is no obligation on a foreign
employer to deduct local tax at source from its employees. This can lead to
a cash flow advantage where the contractor spends less than 183 days in the
country. Furthermore the contractor can be gaining interest on the money
that is being held back for payment of the tax, which sometimes won't be due
for six months after the end of the relevant tax year.
c) Simplification of the contractors UK tax position
By remaining in the employment of a UK company the contractor's position
with the UK tax authorities is clear, and obtaining UK tax-free status at
the appropriate time can be organised by the employer on behalf of the
contractor.
d) Generous UK tax breaks for employees working overseas
The UK tax system allows generous tax-free allowances for expenditure
incurred while working overseas, including travel costs, accommodation and
subsistence.
e) No corporate residence complications
Unlike the contractor working for his own UK one-man company, the employee
of the UK management company will not be assessed as an employee of a local
company. The management company will generally be owned, controlled and
managed in the UK, thereby ensuring its status as a UK tax resident company.
Having said all this, I should again re-emphasise that no solution,
including the UK management company, is the best solution in every
situation, and the contractor's overall position must always be taken into
account in deciding the best option. Destination, length of contract,
marital status, level of contract income and whether you've been overseas
before will all influence the choice of solution for you. So the best piece
of advice is generally “look before you leap!”.

Global K
provides
tax planning and solutions to contractors taking up a contract assignment in
a foreign location. For further information on the tax implications of your
proposed assignment, including contains full contact details,
click here.
The author accepts no responsibility for any
loss which may be suffered by anyone taking action based on advice given or
solutions offered in the contents of this article. Personal professional
advice should always be sought by anyone deciding to undertake a contract
overseas.
